Arrowsmlft.gif (338 bytes)Previous Table of Contents NextArrowsmrt.gif (337 bytes)

SURRENDER OPTIONS

The surrender values provided under the Standard Nonforfeiture Law can be taken by the policyowner in one of three forms:

 

 

These forms are properly referred to as surrender benefits, but since the policyowner has the option or privilege of choosing the form under which the surrender value is to be paid, the benefits are usually referred to as surrender options.

The Standard Nonforfeiture Law requires that a surrender benefit be granted whenever a value appears under the formula. This may be as early as the end of the first year under some policies and later than 3 years under other policies. Under most plans and at most ages of issue, a surrender value will appear in the second policy year. Formerly no cash or other surrender benefits were required in the case of term insurance policies of 20 years or less. Under the current law a level-premium term policy for more than 15 years�or one that expires after age 65, regardless of its duration�must provide surrender benefits if the mandated formula indicates that one exists.

The nature and significance of the various standard forms of surrender benefits will be discussed in the following sections.

Cash

The simplest form in which the surrender value may be taken is cash. After the policy has been in force long enough to have no surrender charges, there is an exact equivalence between the surrender value of a policy and the cash that can be obtained upon its surrender, leading many persons to refer to the surrender value generically as the cash surrender value. The new law requires that the surrender value of a policy be made available in the form of cash, but it does not compel a company to grant cash values until the end of 3 years in the case of ordinary insurance. This limitation on cash values was provided in order to relieve the companies of the expense of drawing checks for the relatively small values that might have developed during the first and second policy years. It does not, however, relieve the company of the obligation to make available in some noncash form of benefit any surrender value that might accumulate during the first 2 years. Most companies waive this statutory provision and provide a cash value as soon as any value develops under the policy.

The law permits a company to postpone payment of the cash surrender value for a period of 6 months after demand thereof and surrender of the policy. This delay clause was given statutory sanction in order to protect companies against any losses that might otherwise arise from excessive demands for cash during an extreme financial emergency. The law has made the inclusion of a delay clause mandatory and has made the delay period of 6 months uniform. It is contem-plated that the clause would be invoked only under the most unusual circum-stances. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company was already experiencing a run on its assets from demand for policy surrenders and maximum policy loans before it sought both the protection of the delay clause and intervention by the state insurance commissioner. Even though the company was in poor financial shape, it was reluctant to impose the delay clause until loss of confidence was so widespread that it had no other choice.

As might be expected, provision is made for deduction of any policy indebtedness (policy loans plus accrued interest) from the cash value that would otherwise be available.

Impact of Electing Surrender Benefits

The impact of the election of each surrender benefit on the structure of the underlying insurance contract is illustrated in figures 10�1 through 10�4. In each case the underlying contract will be assumed to be a whole life policy, but the principle involved is applicable to any type of contract with some modification.

Figure 10�1 shows the change produced in cash value life insurance contracts by the exercise of the cash surrender option. The figure indicates that up to the point of surrender, the contract is a combination of protection and cash value. By surrendering the policy for cash, however, the policyowner takes the cash value element of the contract and, in so doing, terminates the protection element as well. Subject only to any reinstatement privilege, if any, that might exist, the company has no further obligations under the contract. Generally the reinstatement rights are available only to policies that have terminated for reasons other than a cash surrender.

FIGURE 10-1
Effect of Cash Surrender on Structure of Several Types of Life Insurance Contracts

 

Reduced Paid-Up Insurance

This form of surrender benefit is referred to as reduced paid-up insurance, in recognition of the fact that under this option, the withdrawing policyowner receives a reduced amount of paid-up cash value insurance, payable upon the same conditions as the original policy. If the original policy was either an ordinary life or a limited-payment life policy, the insurance under this option will be paid-up whole life insurance. If the original policy was an endowment contract, this option will provide an endowment with the same maturity date but in a reduced amount. Some companies make this option available under a term policy, in which case an appropriately reduced amount of term insurance is paid up to the expiry date of the original term policy.

The amount of paid-up insurance provided under this option is the sum that can be purchased at the insured�s attained age by the net surrender value (cash value, less any policy indebtedness, plus the cash value of any dividend additions or deposits) applied as a net single premium computed on the mortality and interest bases specified in the policy for the calculation of the surrender value. The amount of paid-up insurance available at various durations under an ordinary life and under a 20-payment life policy, issued at age 35, is shown in table 10�1.

 

 

TABLE 10-1
Example of Surrender Benefits at Selected Durations for Ordinary Life and 20-Payment Life (Issue Age 35, Male 1980 CSO Mortality, 4.5 Percent Interest)

Ordinary Life

20-Payment Whole Life

 

Policy
Year

 

Cash Value

Reduced Paid-up Insurance

 

Extended Term Insurance

 

Cash
Value

Reduced Paid-up Insurance

 

Extended Term
Insurance

     

Yrs.

Days

   

Yrs.

Days

3

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

6

28

92

168

250

336

429

523

28

122

331

498

630

721

794

850

1

6

13

16

16

15

14

12

297

261

211

15

170

186

9

119

7

40

142

266

420

487

558

629

29

157

468

743

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

2

9

20

25

27

22

18

14

42

216

318

145

242

175

88

300

All values are per $1,000 of insurance.

 

 

Paid-up insurance is provided under this option at net premium rates, despite the fact that maintenance and surrender or settlement expenses will be incurred on the policies. The law made no specific allowance for expenses on the theory that the margins in the mortality and interest assumptions underlying the net rates are sufficient to absorb any expenses that will be involved. In the case of participating insurance, however, any margins available for this purpose are reduced by the payment of dividends on the paid-up insurance.

It is interesting to note that there is a surrender privilege under reduced paid-up whole life and endowment policies. The law states that such policies can be surrendered for cash within 30 days after any policy anniversary, provided the original policy was in force long enough to grant a cash value. In other words, the cash surrender privilege of the paid-up policy cannot be used to subvert the provision in the law that cash values need not be granted until the end of 3 years.

The effect of the reduced paid-up insurance option on the structure of the whole life policy is illustrated in figure 10�2. It is readily apparent that the most important impact is on the protection element of the contract. In the example, the cash value before surrender had accumulated to a sum half the face of the policy, which at age 60, for instance, would purchase a paid-up whole life policy in an amount approximately 75 percent of the original face. The entire shrinkage comes out of the protection element, however, since the investment element continues to increase until it equals the reduced face at the end of the mortality table. The same phenomenon occurs with a surrender at any duration. As was pointed out, this cash value element of a reduced paid-up policy can be converted into cash by surrendering the policy pursuant to its terms.

Universal life insurance and variable universal life policies provide a nonguaranteed form of reduced paid-up option. The policyowner can reduce the death benefit so that the existing cash value is sufficient to cover all future charges, helped by the future earnings credited to the cash value. The nonguaranteed element is the fact that the policyowner bears the investment risk, and if the earnings on the cash value drop below the level anticipated when the policy benefit was reduced, further adjustment(s) may be needed.

The policyowner has to explicitly request a death benefit reduction to create the equivalent of a reduced paid-up surrender option for a universal or variable universal life policy.

Extended Term Insurance

The extended term insurance option provides paid-up term insurance in an amount equal to the original face of the policy, increased by any dividend additions or deposits and decreased by any policy indebtedness. The length of the term is such that it can be purchased at the insured�s attained age by the application of the net surrender value as a net single premium. This gives effect to the statutory requirement that the present value at the time of surrender of any paid-up surrender benefit must be at least the equivalent of the surrender value. The period for which term insurance is provided for various durations under an ordinary life policy, and under a 20-payment life policy, issued at age 35, is shown in table 10�1.

Universal and variable universal life insurance policies do not have a guaranteed extended term surrender option. However, they are automatically configured to work similarly to extended term insurance. These policies have no fixed or required premiums, and the viability of the contract depends on the account balance of the policy�s cash value. The policy will remain in force as long as the cash value is sufficient to cover the next 60 days of charges for mortality (term charges) and administration and until these charges consume the cash value.

 

 

FIGURE 10-2
Effect of Reduced Paid-up Insurance on Structure of Several Types of Life Insurance Contracts

 

 

 

The law provides that if there is any indebtedness against the policy at the time of its surrender, both the amount of term insurance and the surrender value used as a net single premium shall be reduced by the amount of the loan. By the same token, if there are any dividend additions standing to the credit of the policy, the amount of the additions will be added to the face amount of the extended insurance, and the cash value of the additions will be added to the sum applied as a net single premium.

This may be illustrated by a $1,000 policy that at the time of surrender has a surrender value of $500, dividend additions of $100 that have a cash value of $75, and a policy loan of $250. Under such circumstances the face of the extended policy is $850 ($1,000 + $100 � $250), and the net single premium is $325 ($500 + $75 � $250).

It is readily apparent that the policy loan should be deducted from the surrender value to determine the net single premium, since it is only the net value that is available for the purchase of extended insurance, but many persons do not understand why it is also necessary to deduct the policy loan from the face of the policy. The requirement is founded on underwriting considerations. If the policy indebtedness is not deducted from the face of the extended policy, the companies will be exposed to a virulent form of antiselection.

Consider the case of a person suffering from an incurable illness who has a $200,000 life insurance policy with a $100,000 cash value. If, to meet the cost of medical treatment or for any other reason, he or she borrows the maximum amount against the cash value, say $95,000, and then dies shortly thereafter, the company will be obligated to pay only $105,000, since the policy loan is an encumbrance against both the cash value and the death proceeds. The total return will thus equal the face of the policy, or $200,000. If, on the other hand, he or she borrows $90,000, for example, surrenders the policy, and applies the remaining equity, $10,000, to the purchase at net rates of $200,000 of extended term insurance, death within the next few years will result in a total payment�the face plus the loan�of $290,000. Under present practice as required by law, the ill policyowner can extend only $110,000, thus limiting the total obligation of the company to $200,000, as was the original intent.

The theory on which the deduction of policy loans is based is that the cancellation of an unliquidated policy loan constitutes a prepayment of a portion of the face amount. To ignore policy indebtedness in determining the face amount of extended insurance would be to make available, without medical or other evidence of insurability, additional term insurance equivalent to the policy indebtedness. This strategy would violate all the tenets of sound underwriting.

The effect of deducting the policy loan from both the surrender value and the amount of extended insurance is to produce a shorter period of term insurance than would be available if no loan existed. This is a natural consequence of the fact that the deduction is a much greater proportion of the cash value than it is of the face amount of the policy. Theoretically the amount of term insurance should not be the face amount less the loan, as required by law, but should be the face amount less the portion thereof having a cash value equal to the loan; in other words, a proportionate part of the policy would be surrendered to pay the loan, and only the remainder would be continued as term insurance. If this method were used, a lower amount of coverage would be extended and the period of term insurance would not be affected by policy indebtedness. The rule laid down by law in effect increases the total insurance extended and thus reduces the term, since the net cash value remains the same.

Thus if a policy of $1,000 has a cash value of $500 and policy indebtedness of $200, the net cash value of $300 (one-half of the death benefit it will support) will support a $600 benefit. Seen from the loan perspective, a $400 reduction in coverage will be required to offset $200 of loan forgiveness. The proper amount of extended insurance is $600, instead of $800, as presently provided. In other words, the amount of the term insurance is reduced by 20 percent, whereas the cash value available to purchase it is reduced by 40 percent. The period of insurance, therefore, must be less than it would be if no indebtedness existed.

From the standpoint of the companies, paid-up term insurance is a more attractive surrender benefit than paid-up whole life or endowment insurance. The companies consider the favorable features of extended term insurance to be (1) the relatively large amount of insurance involved, with the correspondingly low expense rate; (2) the definite date of expiry, which limits the maintenance expenses and minimizes the problem of tracing policyowners; (3) the uninterrupted continuation of the original amount of coverage, as modified by dividend additions and policy loans, for those persons who contemplate eventual reinstatement; and (4) its adaptability to liberal reinstatement requirements, which stems from the fact that the amount at risk is normally decreased by reinstatement, in contrast to the increase in the amount at risk that occurs on the reinstatement of reduced paid-up insurance.

The only real disadvantage of extended term insurance from the insurer�s standpoint is the adverse mortality selection encountered, and this can be hedged through the use of the higher mortality assumptions authorized by law or minimized through making the extended term option the automatic paid-up benefit. All things considered, the extended term option is so attractive that most companies designate it as the option to go into effect automatically if the insured does not elect another available option within 60 days after the due date of the premium in default.

The change produced in the structure of a whole life insurance policy by its surrender for extended term insurance is plotted in figure 10-3. This diagram reveals that, in direct contrast to the situation under reduced paid-up insurance, the protection element grows progressively larger, and the investment element progressively smaller, until the policy finally expires. The investment element is at a peak at the time of surrender but is gradually used up in the payment of term insurance premiums, being completely exhausted at the point of expiry. Because of the complementary nature of the protection and investment elements in any insurance contract, the protection element becomes constantly larger, eventually equaling the face of the extended insurance. This explains why the amount at risk is reduced through the reinstatement of a policy that has been running under the extended term option.

The investment element of a paid-up term insurance policy can be obtained by surrendering the insurance for cash, subject to the same conditions governing the surrender of reduced paid-up insurance. Extended term insurance is normally nonparticipating with respect to dividends.

 

 

FIGURE 10-3
Effect of Extended Term Insurance Option on Structure of Several Types of Life Insurance Contracts

Arrowsmlft.gif (338 bytes)Previous TopArrowsm.gif (337 bytes) NextArrowsmrt.gif (337 bytes)